Export limit exceeded: 371942 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 371942 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 371942 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9035 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-58269 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Rancher Manager, where sensitive information, including secret data, cluster import URLs, and registration tokens, is exposed to any entity with access to Rancher audit logs. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3403 | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Vivotek NVR ND8422P, NVR ND9525P and NVR ND9541P 2.4.0.204/3.3.0.104/4.2.0.101. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the component HTML Form Handler. The manipulation leads to inclusion of sensitive information in source code. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47759 | 1 Ttyplus | 1 Mtputty | 2026-04-15 | 6.2 Medium |
| MTPutty 1.0.1.21 contains a sensitive information disclosure vulnerability that allows local attackers to view SSH connection passwords through Windows PowerShell process listing. Attackers can run a PowerShell command to retrieve the full command line of MTPutty processes, exposing plaintext SSH credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2022-35202 | 1 Sitevision | 1 Sitevision | 2026-04-15 | 5.1 Medium |
| A security issue in Sitevision version 10.3.1 and older allows a remote attacker, in certain (non-default) scenarios, to gain access to the private keys used for signing SAML Authn requests. The underlying issue is a Java keystore that may become accessible and downloadable via WebDAV. This keystore is protected with a low-complexity, auto-generated password. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43141 | 1 Rolandbarkerxnauwebdesign | 1 Participants Database | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Roland Barker, xnau webdesign Participants Database allows Object Injection.This issue affects Participants Database: from n/a through 2.5.9.2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36407 | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical | ||
| Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform VP9500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G1000, G1500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F1500, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5100, 5500, 5100H, 5500H, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5200, 5600, 5200H, 5600H, Hitachi Unified Storage VM, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G100, G200, G400, G600, G800, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F400, F600, F800, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F350, F370, F700, F900, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H allows local users to gain sensitive information.This issue affects Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform: before DKCMAIN Ver. 70-06-74-00/00, SVP Ver. 70-06-58/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform VP9500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 70-06-74-00/00, SVP Ver. 70-06-58/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G1000, G1500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-92-00/00, SVP Ver. 80-06-87/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F1500: before DKCMAIN Ver. 80-06-92-00/00, SVP Ver. 80-06-87/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5100, 5500,5100H, 5500H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-81-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-81/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-62-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-62/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-43-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-43/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform 5200, 5600,5200H, 5600H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-81-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-81/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-62-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-62/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 90-08-43-00/00, SVP Ver. 90-08-43/00; Hitachi Unified Storage VM: before DKCMAIN Ver. 73-03-75-X0/00, SVP Ver. 73-03-74/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 73(75)-03-75-X0/00, SVP Ver. 73(75)-03-74/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G100, G200, G400, G600, G800: before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-06-19-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-06-20-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-05-47-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-05-51-X0/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F400, F600, F800: before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-06-19-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-06-20-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 83-05-47-X0/00, SVP Ver. 83-05-51-X0/00; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G130, G150, G350, G370, G700, G900: before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-09-XX/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-11-X0/02; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform F350, F370, F700, F900: before DKCMAIN Ver. 88-08-09-XX/00, SVP Ver. 88-08-11-X0/02; Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform E390, E590, E790, E990, E1090, E390H, E590H, E790H, E1090H: before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-81-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-81-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-62-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-62-X0/00, before DKCMAIN Ver. 93-06-43-X0/00, SVP Ver. 93-06-43-X0/00. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7729 | 1 Cayintech | 15 Cms-20, Cms-60, Cms-se and 12 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| The CAYIN Technology CMS lacks proper access control, allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to download arbitrary CGI files. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49756 | 1 Ash Framework | 1 Ashpostgres | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| AshPostgres is the PostgreSQL data layer for Ash Framework. Starting in version 2.0.0 and prior to version 2.4.10, in certain very specific situations, it was possible for the policies of an update action to be skipped. This occurred only on "empty" update actions (no changing fields), and would allow their hooks (side effects) to be performed when they should not have been. Note that this does not allow reading new data that the user should not have had access to, only triggering a side effect a user should not have been able to trigger. To be vulnerable, an affected user must have an update action that is on a resource with no attributes containing an "update default" (updated_at timestamp, for example); can be performed atomically; does not have `require_atomic? false`; has at least one authorizer (typically `Ash.Policy.Authorizer`); and has at least one `change` (on the resource's `changes` block or in the action itself). This is where the side-effects would be performed when they should not have been. This problem has been patched in `2.4.10` of `ash_postgres`. Several workarounds are available. Potentially affected users may determine that none of their actions are vulnerable using a script the maintainers provide in the GitHub Security Advisory, add `require_atomic? false` to any potentially affected update action, replace any usage of `Ash.update` with `Ash.bulk_update` for an affected action, and/or add an update timestamp to their action. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53247 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Enterprise, Splunk Secure Gateway | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.3.2, 9.2.4, and 9.1.7, and versions below 3.4.261 and 3.7.13 of the Splunk Secure Gateway app on Splunk Cloud Platform, a low-privileged user that does not hold the “admin“ or “power“ Splunk roles could perform a Remote Code Execution (RCE). | ||||
| CVE-2024-52940 | 1 Anydesk | 1 Anydesk | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| AnyDesk through 8.1.0 on Windows, when Allow Direct Connections is enabled, inadvertently exposes a public IP address within network traffic. The attacker must know the victim's AnyDesk ID. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2222 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| CWE-552: Files or Directories Accessible to External Parties vulnerability over https exists that could leak information and potential privilege escalation following man in the middle attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6880 | 1 Jan Syski | 1 Megabip | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| During MegaBIP installation process, a user is encouraged to change a default path to administrative portal, as keeping it secret is listed by the author as one of the protection mechanisms. Publicly available source code of "/registered.php" discloses that path, allowing an attacker to attempt further attacks. This issue affects MegaBIP software versions below 5.15 | ||||
| CVE-2025-69036 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in strongholdthemes Tech Life CPT techlife-cpt allows Object Injection.This issue affects Tech Life CPT: from n/a through <= 16.4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2102 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') vulnerability in HYPR Passwordless on Windows allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects HYPR Passwordless: before 10.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4418 | 1 Redhat | 3 Advanced Virtualization, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2026-04-15 | 6.2 Medium |
| A race condition leading to a stack use-after-free flaw was found in libvirt. Due to a bad assumption in the virNetClientIOEventLoop() method, the `data` pointer to a stack-allocated virNetClientIOEventData structure ended up being used in the virNetClientIOEventFD callback while the data pointer's stack frame was concurrently being "freed" when returning from virNetClientIOEventLoop(). The 'virtproxyd' daemon can be used to trigger requests. If libvirt is configured with fine-grained access control, this issue, in theory, allows a user to escape their otherwise limited access. This flaw allows a local, unprivileged user to access virtproxyd without authenticating. Remote users would need to authenticate before they could access it. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23215 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| PMD is an extensible multilanguage static code analyzer. The passphrase for the PMD and PMD Designer release signing keys are included in jar published to Maven Central. The private key itself is not known to have been compromised itself, but given its passphrase is, it must also be considered potentially compromised. As a mitigation, both compromised keys have been revoked so that no future use of the keys are possible. Note, that the published artifacts in Maven Central under the group id net.sourceforge.pmd are not compromised and the signatures are valid. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4701 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in VITA-MLLM Freeze-Omni up to 20250421. This issue affects the function torch.load of the file models/utils.py. The manipulation of the argument path leads to deserialization. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. | ||||
| CVE-2023-25581 | 1 Pac4j | 1 Pac4j | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| pac4j is a security framework for Java. `pac4j-core` prior to version 4.0.0 is affected by a Java deserialization vulnerability. The vulnerability affects systems that store externally controlled values in attributes of the `UserProfile` class from pac4j-core. It can be exploited by providing an attribute that contains a serialized Java object with a special prefix `{#sb64}` and Base64 encoding. This issue may lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the worst case. Although a `RestrictedObjectInputStream` is in place, that puts some restriction on what classes can be deserialized, it still allows a broad range of java packages and potentially exploitable with different gadget chains. pac4j versions 4.0.0 and greater are not affected by this issue. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13805 | 1 Nutzam | 1 Nutzboot | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low |
| A weakness has been identified in nutzam NutzBoot up to 2.6.0-SNAPSHOT. This affects the function getInputStream of the file nutzcloud/nutzcloud-literpc/src/main/java/org/nutz/boot/starter/literpc/impl/endpoint/http/HttpServletRpcEndpoint.java of the component LiteRpc-Serializer. Executing a manipulation can lead to deserialization. The attack may be launched remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is reported as difficult. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41926 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The webserver utilizes basic authentication for its user login to the configuration interface. As encryption is disabled on port 80, it enables potential eavesdropping on user traffic, making it possible to intercept their credentials. | ||||