| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The nsrpush process in the client in EMC NetWorker before 7.6.5.3 and 8.x before 8.0.1.4 sets weak permissions for unspecified files, which allows local users to gain privileges via unknown vectors. |
| The (1) install and (2) upgrade processes in EMC NetWorker Module for Microsoft Applications (NMM) 2.2.1, 2.3 before build 122, and 2.4 before build 375, when Exchange Server is used, allow local users to read cleartext administrator credentials via unspecified vectors. |
| The Iomega Home Media Network Hard Drive with EMC Lifeline firmware before 2.104, Home Media Network Hard Drive Cloud Edition with EMC Lifeline firmware before 3.2.3.15290, iConnect with EMC Lifeline firmware before 2.5.26.18966, and StorCenter with EMC Lifeline firmware before 2.0.18.23122, 2.1.x before 2.1.42.18967, and 3.x before 3.2.3.15290 allow remote authenticated users to read or modify data on arbitrary remote shares via unspecified vectors. |
| EMC Celerra Network Server 6.x before 6.0.61.0, VNX 7.x before 7.0.53.2, and VNXe 2.0 and 2.1 before 2.1.3.19077 (aka MR1 SP3.2) and 2.2 before 2.2.0.19078 (aka MR2 SP0.2) do not properly implement NFS access control, which allows remote authenticated users to read or modify files via a (1) NFSv2, (2) NFSv3, or (3) NFSv4 request. |
| The default configuration of ExShortcut\Web.config in EMC SourceOne Email Management before 6.6 SP1, when the Mobile Services component is used, does not properly set the localOnly attribute of the trace element, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via ASP.NET Application Tracing. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in EMC RSA Key Manager (RKM) C Client 1.5.x allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the metadata section of encrypted key data. |
| Integer signedness error in the authentication functionality in librpc.dll in the Informix Storage Manager (ISM) Portmapper service (aka portmap.exe), as used in IBM Informix Dynamic Server (IDS) 10.x before 10.00.TC9 and 11.x before 11.10.TC3 and EMC Legato NetWorker, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted parameter size that triggers a stack-based buffer overflow. |
| Buffer overflow in Drive Control Program (DCP) in EMC AlphaStor 4.0 before build 814 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving a new device name. |
| The SSLEngine API implementation in EMC RSA BSAFE SSL-J 5.x before 5.1.3 and 6.x before 6.0.2 allows remote attackers to trigger the selection of a weak cipher suite by using the wrap method during a certain incomplete-handshake state. |
| The (1) JSAFE and (2) JSSE APIs in EMC RSA BSAFE SSL-J 5.x before 5.1.3 and 6.x before 6.0.2 make it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended cryptographic protection mechanisms by triggering application-data processing during the TLS handshake, a time at which the data is both unencrypted and unauthenticated. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Service Monitor before 8.6, as used in Unified Operations Manager before 8.6 and CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution 3.x and 4.x before 4.1; and multiple EMC Ionix products including Application Connectivity Monitor (Ionix ACM) 2.3 and earlier, Adapter for Alcatel-Lucent 5620 SAM EMS (Ionix ASAM) 3.2.0.2 and earlier, IP Management Suite (Ionix IP) 8.1.1.1 and earlier, and other Ionix products; allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets to TCP port 9002, aka Bug IDs CSCtn42961 and CSCtn64922, related to a buffer overflow. |
| EMC Captiva eInput 2.1.1 before 2.1.1.37 does not restrict the origin of calls to ActiveX functions, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files or cause a denial of service via a crafted web site. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in ftserver.exe in the OpenText Hummingbird Client Connector, as used in the Indexing Server in EMC Documentum eRoom 7.x before 7.4.3.f and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending a crafted message over TCP. |
| EMC RSA Archer SmartSuite Framework 4.x and RSA Archer GRC 5.x before 5.2SP1 allow remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web page. |
| The EMC Celerra Network Attached Storage (NAS) appliance accepts external network traffic to IP addresses intended for an intranet network within the appliance, which allows remote attackers to read, create, or modify arbitrary files in the user data directory via NFS requests. |
| librpc.dll in nsrexecd in EMC NetWorker before 7.5 SP4, 7.5.3.x before 7.5.3.5, and 7.6.x before 7.6.1.2 does not properly mitigate the possibility of a spoofed localhost source IP address, which allows remote attackers to (1) register or (2) unregister RPC services, and consequently cause a denial of service or obtain sensitive information from interprocess communication, via crafted UDP packets containing service commands. |
| ELAN Match-on-Chip FPR solution has design fault about potential risk of valid SID leakage and enumeration with spoof sensor.
This fault leads to that Windows Hello recognition would be bypass with cloning SID to cause broken account identity.
Version which is lower than 3.0.12011.08009(Legacy)/3.3.12011.08103(ESS) would suffer this risk on DELL Inspiron platform. |
|
Dell AppSync, versions 4.4.0.0 to 4.6.0.0 including Service Pack releases, contains an improper access control vulnerability in Embedded Service Enabler component. A local malicious user could potentially exploit this vulnerability during installation leading to a privilege escalation.
|
| Trend Micro's Virus Scan API (VSAPI) and Advanced Threat Scan Engine (ATSE) - are vulnerable to a memory exhaustion vulnerability that may lead to denial-of-service or system freeze if exploited by an attacker using a specially crafted file. |
| RSA Authentication Manager versions prior to 8.4 P11 contain a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Security Console. A malicious RSA Authentication Manager Security Console administrator with advanced privileges could exploit this vulnerability to store arbitrary HTML or JavaScript code through the Security Console web interface. When other Security Console administrators open the affected page, the injected scripts could potentially be executed in their browser. |
