Search Results (10614 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-63123 1 Tina 1 Tinacms 2026-08-25 6.5 Medium
Tina is a headless content management system. Prior to 2.5.2, the TinaCMS CLI package's Vite dev server packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/vite/cors.ts origin callback returns false for a disallowed origin but does not reject the request, and packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/vite/plugins.ts still routes POST /media/upload/* to mediaRouter.handlePost. The upload code in packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/commands/dev-command/server/media.ts writes attacker-controlled multipart contents inside the configured media root. A remote attacker can cause a developer's browser to submit this state-changing request by inducing the developer to visit an attacker-controlled page while tinacms dev is running. This issue is fixed in version 2.5.2.
CVE-2026-75803 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2026-08-25 N/A
Issue summary: ChaCha20-Poly1305 and AES-OCB decryption with an empty ciphertext can report success without verifying the supplied authentication tag when the operation is finalized by calling the EVP_Cipher() function. Impact summary: Applications calling EVP_Cipher() on an empty ciphertext and expecting the call to check the AEAD tag may accept forged messages. CWE: CWE-354 (Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value) Description: The EVP_Cipher() API call for AEAD ciphers behaves like a one shot encryption and decryption call. It also verifies the AEAD tag after the decryption operation. However for AES-OCB and ChaCha20-Poly1305 ciphers it skipped the AEAD tag verification when an empty ciphertext was passed to the function. The callers of this function might believe that a successful return indicates a valid AEAD tag for these ciphers, even when that has not truly been validated in this case. FIPS impact: no The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this CVE as the affected algorithms are not FIPS approved and thus not implemented in the FIPS module.
CVE-2026-71694 1 Riscv-boom 1 Boom 2026-08-25 8.8 High
An issue in Berkeley Out-of-Order Machine (BOOM) / BoomTile RTL benchmark v1.2 2d08d0d8b4563212175212f9db0e69f6e68c9619 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the CSR trap-return state restoration logic, MRET handling logic, mstatus.MPRV update path, CSRFile logic in ProcessorFuzz BOOM benchmark Benchmarks/Verilog/SmallBoomTile_v1.2_state.v
CVE-2026-71123 1 Oracle 1 Hyperion Financial Management 2026-08-24 5.4 Medium
Vulnerability in the Oracle Hyperion Financial Management product of Oracle Hyperion (component: Security). The supported version that is affected is 11.2.25.0.000. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Hyperion Financial Management. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Hyperion Financial Management accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Hyperion Financial Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N).
CVE-2026-66635 2 10web, Wordpress 2 Sliderby10web, Wordpress 2026-08-24 7.4 High
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Slider by 10Web <= 1.2.62 versions.
CVE-2026-78279 2 Wordpress, Wpmanageninja 2 Wordpress, Fluent Support 2026-08-24 5.4 Medium
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Fluent Support Pro <= 2.3.1 versions.
CVE-2026-58003 1 Wwbn 1 Avideo 2026-08-24 7.1 High
WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the releaseVideoNow.json.php endpoint that lacks authenticity checks and accepts GET requests. Attackers can craft a malicious cross-site GET request carrying an administrator's session cookie to permanently publish any embargoed video by manipulating the videos_id parameter.
CVE-2026-78280 2 Hashthemes, Wordpress 2 Hash Form, Wordpress 2026-08-24 4.3 Medium
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Hash Form <= 1.4.0 versions.
CVE-2026-68118 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-23 8.2 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an in-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT. A non-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a challenge ACK. RFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in SYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact in-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped. Apply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC sequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order. Factor the per-netns challenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets can share it. Use the request socket's send_ack() callback and its own out-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.
CVE-2026-72325 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-22 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf/x86/amd/core: Avoid enabling BRS from the SVM reload path Branch Sampling (BRS) and Last Branch Record (LBR) are mutually exclusive hardware features, and users of both are tracked via cpuc->lbr_users. When SVM is toggled on a CPU, the host perf events are reprogrammed to update the HostOnly filter bit (set when virtualization is enabled, cleared when it is disabled). On PerfMonV2-capable processors, this reprogramming is performed by calling amd_pmu_enable_all() to rewrite the event selectors. However, amd_pmu_enable_all() also calls amd_brs_enable_all(), which enables BRS whenever cpuc->lbr_users > 0. Having active LBR events satisfies this gating on processors that have LBR but not BRS. The kernel then tries to set the BRS enable bit in DebugExtnCfg (MSR 0xc000010f). Since that bit is deprecated on such hardware, the write results in a #GP: Call Trace: <IRQ> amd_pmu_enable_all+0x1d/0x90 amd_pmu_disable_virt+0x62/0xb0 kvm_arch_disable_virtualization_cpu+0xa/0x40 [kvm] hardware_disable_nolock+0x1a/0x30 [kvm] __flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x9b/0x410 __sysvec_call_function+0x18/0xc0 sysvec_call_function+0x69/0x90 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_sysvec_call_function+0x16/0x20 RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xc4/0x450 ? cpuidle_enter_state+0xb7/0x450 cpuidle_enter+0x29/0x40 cpuidle_idle_call+0xf5/0x160 do_idle+0x7b/0xe0 cpu_startup_entry+0x26/0x30 start_secondary+0x115/0x140 secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0x194/0x19b </TASK> Fix this by ensuring that BRS is not enabled from the event selector reprogramming path even when cpuc->lbr_users > 0.
CVE-2026-72398 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-22 9.8 Critical
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: add INIT verification after cookie unpacking In SCTP handshake, the INIT chunk is initially processed by the server and embedded into the cookie carried in INIT-ACK. The client then returns this cookie via COOKIE-ECHO, where the server unpacks it and reconstructs the original INIT chunk. When cookie authentication is enabled, the cookie contents are protected against tampering, so reusing the unpacked INIT without re-verification is safe. However, when cookie authentication is disabled, the reconstructed INIT can no longer be trusted. In this case, the INIT must be explicitly validated after unpacking to avoid processing potentially tampered data. Add sctp_verify_init() checks after cookie unpacking in COOKIE-ECHO processing paths (sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce() and sctp_sf_do_5_2_4_dupcook()) when cookie_auth_enable is disabled. On failure, the new association is freed and the packet is discarded. Also tighten cookie validation in sctp_unpack_cookie() by verifying the embedded chunk type is SCTP_CID_INIT before treating it as an INIT chunk. Finally, update sctp_verify_init() to validate parameter bounds using the actual embedded INIT length instead of chunk->chunk_end, since the INIT stored in COOKIE-ECHO may not span the entire chunk buffer.
CVE-2026-72416 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-22 7.3 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_compat: ebtables emulation must reject non-bridge targets xtables targets return netfilter verdicts: NF_ACCEPT, NF_DROP, and so on. ebtables targets return incompatible verdicts: EBT_ACCEPT, EBT_DROP, ... We cannot allow fallback to NFPROTO_UNSPEC. ebtables doesn't permit this since 11ff7288beb2 ("netfilter: ebtables: reject non-bridge targets") but that commit missed the nft_compat layer.
CVE-2026-74305 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-22 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays The fix in commit abad3d0bad72 ("bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local storage") is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check treats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored storage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail call chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even though cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller's context, that is, A -> B(no storage) -> C(storage) path. Requiring exact cookie equality would break the legitimate case of a storage-less leaf program being tail called from a storage-using one. Instead, only accept a zero storage cookie if the program cannot perform tail calls itself. This keeps A -> B(no storage) working while rejecting the A -> B(no storage) -> C(storage) bridge.
CVE-2026-74867 2 B3log, Siyuan 2 Siyuan, Siyuan 2026-08-21 4.2 Medium
SiYuan versions before 3.7.4 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the session-cookie authentication branch of CheckAuth() that lacks Origin/Referer validation and sets no explicit SameSite attribute on session cookies. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users by submitting requests with valid session cookies, relying on browser default SameSite policies rather than server-enforced protections.
CVE-2026-67921 1 Halo 1 Halo 2026-08-21 9.3 Critical
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Halo CMS versions up to 2.25.4 via the CorsConfigurer.java and the CsrfConfigurer.java components. This allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2026-67361 1 J2commerce.com 1 J2store Extension For Joomla 2026-08-21 N/A
Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Unauthenticated file upload with missing directory protection in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5 - The file upload endpoint accepted POST requests from unauthenticated visitors with no CSRF token. Compounding this, the installer manifest omitted the upload and invoices directories, causing fresh installs to deploy those directories without .htaccess/web.config protection, making uploaded files directly web-accessible.
CVE-2026-67358 1 J2commerce.com 1 J2store Extension For Joomla 2026-08-21 N/A
Joomla Extension - j2commerce.com - Download quota manipulation in J2Store 1.0.0-3.3.20, 4.0.0-4.0.20, 4.1.0-4.1.5 - An authenticated user with a valid order token could increment the download limit counter on a download record belonging to a different order. The endpoint also lacked a CSRF token.
CVE-2026-76610 1 Yootheme.com 1 Zoo Extension For Joomla 2026-08-21 N/A
Joomla Extension - yootheme.com - Unauthenticated tag modifications in Zoo < 4.1.65 - The comment controller endpoint lacked ACL checks, allowing unauthorized tag modifications by unauthenticated users.
CVE-2026-77029 1 Yootheme.com 1 Zoo Extension For Joomla 2026-08-21 N/A
Joomla Extension - yootheme.com - Missing CSRF tokens on front-end state changes in Zoo < 4.1.66
CVE-2026-68923 1 Mobsf 1 Mobile Security Framework 2026-08-21 6.5 Medium
MobSF is a mobile application security testing tool used. Prior to 4.5.1, mobsf/MobSF/settings.py places django.middleware.csrf.CsrfViewMiddleware only in the deprecated MIDDLEWARE_CLASSES setting and omits it from the active MIDDLEWARE tuple, allowing a remote attacker to make a logged-in victim submit cross-site POST requests to authenticated web endpoints including /delete_scan/, /upload/, /download_scan/, /change_password/, /create_user/, and /delete_user/. This can delete scans, upload or download applications, change passwords, or manage users with the victim account permissions. This issue is fixed in version 4.5.1.