| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A user enumeration vulnerability was found in Portainer CE 2.19.4. This issue occurs during user authentication process, where a difference in response time could allow a remote unauthenticated user to determine if a username is valid or not. |
| An issue in Cute Http File Server v.3.1 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the password verification component. |
| An SSRF issue in REBUILD v.3.5 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via the FileDownloader.java, proxyDownload,URL parameters. |
| An issue in Lepton CMS v.7.0.0 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the upgrade.php file in the languages place. |
| Apfloat v1.10.1 was discovered to contain an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException via the component org.apfloat.internal.DoubleCRTMath::add(double[], double[]). NOTE: this is disputed by multiple third parties who believe there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. The submission may have been based on a tool that is not sufficiently robust for vulnerability identification. |
| Joda Time v2.12.5 was discovered to contain a NullPointerException via the component org.joda.time.format.PeriodFormat::wordBased(Locale). NOTE: this is disputed by multiple third parties who believe there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. The submission may have been based on a tool that is not sufficiently robust for vulnerability identification. |
| JGraphT Core v1.5.2 was discovered to contain a NullPointerException via the component org.jgrapht.alg.util.ToleranceDoubleComparator::compare(Double, Double). NOTE: this is disputed by multiple third parties who believe there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. The submission may have been based on a tool that is not sufficiently robust for vulnerability identification. |
| An issue in ZKTeko BioTime v.8.5.4 and before allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Authentication & Authorization component |
| An issue in lmxcms v.1.41 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted script to the admin.php file. |
| An issue in SeaCMS v.12.9 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands via the admin_safe.php component. |
| In the module "Rotator Img" (posrotatorimg) in versions at least up to 1.1 from PosThemes for PrestaShop, a guest can perform SQL injection. |
| Sangoma Technologies FreePBX before cdr 15.0.18, 16.0.40, 15.0.16, and 16.0.17 was discovered to contain an access control issue via a modified parameter value, e.g., changing extension=self to extension=101. |
| Successfully using libcurl to do a transfer to a specific HTTP origin
(`hostA`) with **Digest** authentication and then changing the origin to a
different one (`hostB`) for a second transfer, reusing the same handle, makes
libcurl wrongly pass on the `Authorization:` header field meant for `hostA`,
to `hostB`. |
| A flaw was found in Netty's HttpPostRequestEncoder, a widely used Java networking library component responsible for constructing multipart HTTP request bodies. The issue arises because user-supplied filenames and field names are directly embedded into Content-Disposition MIME headers without any validation or sanitization of CRLF (\r\n) characters. Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF sequences, an attacker who controls the filename in a multipart upload can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the request body. This may lead to limited Content-Type spoofing or header manipulation against middleware or storage layers processing the request, though the practical impact is constrained by the context in which Netty is deployed. |
| A flaw was found in the Netty STOMP (Streaming Text Oriented Messaging Protocol) decoder. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to inject arbitrary protocol frames by crafting malformed STOMP commands that contain embedded carriage return (CR) and line feed (LF) sequences. This bypasses message boundary checks and can lead to command injection, potentially compromising the integrity of the system. |
| A flaw was found in the netty-codec-haproxy component, part of the Netty network application framework. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to perform protocol-level injection attacks by crafting malformed HAProxy protocol frames that contain embedded carriage return (CR) and line feed (LF) sequences. This can lead to the injection of arbitrary content, potentially disrupting network communication or enabling further attacks. |
| A flaw was found in the netty-codec-compression component of Netty. This vulnerability, caused by a logic error in the bzip2 decoder, allows a remote attacker to send specially crafted bzip2-compressed data. Processing this malformed data can trigger an infinite loop, causing the decoder thread to consume excessive CPU resources. This leads to a denial of service (DoS), requiring manual intervention to restore service. |
| A flaw was found in Netty's netty-codec-http2 component. The HTTP/2 encoder does not properly handle special characters in HTTP headers. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to craft specific HTTP/2 requests, leading to HTTP response splitting and header injection attacks. Such attacks can enable an attacker to manipulate web content or inject malicious headers. |
| A flaw was found in the Netty netty-codec-http component. A remote attacker can send HTTP requests containing highly compressed data. The HTTP decoder in netty-codec-http fails to properly limit the decompression of this content, causing the system to consume excessive memory. This can lead to memory exhaustion and a denial of service (DoS), making the service unavailable to legitimate users. |
| A flaw was found in netty-codec-http. The WebSocket handshaker in this component fails to properly validate protocol version information during the WebSocket upgrade process. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the WebSocket handshake, leading to a bypass of security checks or the negotiation of unexpected protocol versions. This could potentially enable protocol-level attacks. |
