Export limit exceeded: 374188 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (374188 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-71497 | 1 Jhy | 1 Jsoup | 2026-08-07 | 4.7 Medium |
| jsoup is a Java library for working with real-world HTML. From 1.14.3 until 1.23.1, jsoup's HTML parser could incorrectly handle a malformed tag name ending in a control character, causing the tag to acquire the parsing behavior of a different element. When a custom Safelist permits certain raw-text elements, this misparsing can cause content that should remain inert text to be emitted as active markup after serialization, potentially resulting in cross-site scripting. jsoup's built-in Safelists are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 1.23.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48086 | 1 Open-reception | 1 Appointment-booking-software | 2026-08-07 | 9.9 Critical |
| OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, a TENANT_ADMIN promotes themselves to platform-wide GLOBAL_ADMIN through a single PUT request. The role-update handler accepts the `GLOBAL_ADMIN` enum value from any tenant admin updating their own tenant's staff. No policy check enforces that "only an existing GLOBAL_ADMIN may grant GLOBAL_ADMIN", so the schema validation IS the authorization decision. After re-login, the JWT contains the new role and the formerly-tenant-scoped admin reaches every other tenant on the platform. On the hosted OpenReception service this is a scope-changed escalation: a single customer-side tenant administrator gains full platform-wide administrative control over all other tenants' configuration, users, staff records, operational metadata, and tenant lifecycle. Plaintext appointment contents remain subject to the E2E model unless chained with the staff-crypto poisoning issue (V-4) or with staff-passkey hijacking (V-1). On a single-tenant self-hosted deployment it is still a privilege escalation because TENANT_ADMIN should not be able to create new tenants, modify global configuration, or manage other administrators. The same handler also accepts updates targeted at any colleague within the tenant. A tenant admin can promote a separate collaborator account instead of themselves, leaving their own audit trail clean while the platform-wide breach happens through a separate identity. Version 1.0.2 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48076 | 1 Open-reception | 1 Appointment-booking-software | 2026-08-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. The new-client booking flow in versions 1.0.1 and prior consists of three calls: `bootstrap-challenge` (returns a 16-bit PoW challenge with `difficulty=4` leading hex zeroes), `bootstrap-verify` (validates the PoW and issues a Bearer booking access token), and `create-new-client` (consumes the token and creates the tunnel and first appointment). The token correctly binds to `tenantId`, `tunnelId`, `clientPublicKey`, and `emailHash`, but never to `channelId`. The `bootstrap-challenge` request schema does not even accept a `channelId`, and the issued token's payload contains no channel information. Independently, the service function `createNewClientWithAppointment` checks only `channel.archived = false`. The `channel.isPublic` check that protects `addAppointmentToTunnel` is missing in the new-client path. The combination means: an attacker completes the bootstrap flow normally (16-bit PoW, completes in well under one second on commodity hardware, no rate limiting beyond the throttle store), receives a valid booking access token, and then submits the `create-new-client` payload with `channelId` pointing to a private (`isPublic = false`) channel. The booking lands as `CONFIRMED` if the target channel has `requiresConfirmation = false` (the default), otherwise as `NEW`. The patient-facing UI does not list private channels in its picker (`/api/public/channels` correctly filters `isPublic = true`), so the channel ID must be obtained out of band. The companion finding V-10 (schedule endpoint discloses private channels) provides exactly that: a single unauthenticated GET reveals every private channel ID for any tenant. V-10 plus V-11 together make private channels fully reachable to anonymous attackers. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54717 | 1 Silverstripe | 1 Silverstripe | 2026-08-07 | 5.4 Medium |
| Silverstripe CMS is an open source content management system. Prior to 6.2.1, page breadcrumbs in the CMS are vulnerable to cross-site scripting when viewed using the page list view, because page titles are rendered into the breadcrumb trail without being escaped. This issue is fixed in 6.2.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48081 | 1 Open-reception | 1 Appointment-booking-software | 2026-08-07 | 8.1 High |
| OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, a TENANT_ADMIN can store `javascript:` URLs in the tenant `links` configuration (`website`, `imprint`, `privacyStatement`). These values are returned to the patient-facing landing page via `/api/public`, hydrated into the SvelteKit Button component, and rendered as `<a href="javascript:...">` elements without URL-scheme filtering. A patient who clicks any such link executes the attacker's JavaScript inside the patient browser origin, where patient form data is read before client-side encryption is applied. This breaks the project's central trust claim that the server is an untrusted relay and that administrators cannot read patient data. Patient-side encryption happens after form input, so JavaScript executing in the patient origin can read or alter the plaintext before encryption is performed. Version 1.0.2 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1395 | 1 Codriapp | 1 Heygarson | 2026-08-07 | 8.2 High |
| Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in Codriapp Innovation and Software Technologies Inc. HeyGarson allows Fuzzing for application mapping. This issue affects HeyGarson: through 30012026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted and it was learned that the product is not supported. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15570 | 2026-08-07 | N/A | ||
| An improper restriction of URL schemes and destinations in the SmartCenter browserseturl command in the Telefunken TE24553B45V2DZ Smart TV running on the Vestel MB181 / Voltron181 / TiVo OS platform allows an attacker with access to the same local network to cause the embedded browser to issue requests to unintended loopback/internal destinations, including 127.0.0.1 addresses. In demonstrated scenarios, requests initiated through the SmartCenter browserseturl mechanism could reach an internal service and receive a successful response, although the same destination was not reachable through normal browser navigation. The issue affects firmware version V2.78.0.0 and is fixed in firmware version V2.85.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19064 | 1 Sourcecodester | 2 Online Examination Learning Management System, Onlne Examination Learning Management System | 2026-08-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Online Examination & Learning Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /view.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in authorization bypass. The attack can be launched remotely. | ||||
| CVE-2019-18184 | 1 Crestron | 2 Dmc-stro, Dmc-stro Firmware | 2026-08-07 | 9.8 Critical |
| Crestron DMC-STRO 1.0 devices allow remote command execution as root via shell metacharacters to the ping function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15674 | 2 Passster Project, Wordpress | 2 Passster, Wordpress | 2026-08-07 | 2.7 Low |
| The Passster WordPress plugin before 4.3.7 does not restrict low-privilege users holding the edit_posts capability from reading globally password-protected content through the WordPress core REST API when global protection is enabled, allowing any Contributor or higher to read the content of protected pages and posts without knowing the password. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16620 | 2 Wordpress, Wpclever | 2 Wordpress, Wpc Name Your Price For Woocommerce | 2026-08-07 | 7.5 High |
| The WPC Name Your Price for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.2.5 does not enforce its server-side price allowlist for products configured in "Select" price mode, allowing an unauthenticated visitor to add such a product to the cart at an arbitrary value below the merchant-defined allowed prices and commit a real order at that price (revenue loss / underpriced orders). This is a distinct, unfixed vector from CVE-2025-12115, whose 2.2.0 fix only addressed applying a custom price to products where Name Your Price is disabled and left the Select-mode allowlist unenforced through 2.2.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16619 | 2 Miniorange, Wordpress | 2 Miniorange 2fa, Wordpress | 2026-08-07 | 7.5 High |
| The miniOrange 2FA WordPress plugin before 6.2.8 does not correctly limit the number of second-factor verification attempts, tracking them against a client-supplied identifier that is reissued on every login, allowing an attacker who already knows a user's password to guess the one-time code without limit and take over the account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16067 | 2 Event Booking Manager For Woocommerce, Wordpress | 2 Event Booking Manager For Woocommerce (pro), Wordpress | 2026-08-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce (Pro) WordPress plugin before 5.0.3 does not validate the ticket price on the server during its native (non-WooCommerce) checkout, trusting the per-ticket price supplied by the client instead of re-deriving the event's configured price. This allows unauthenticated users to book paid event tickets for free, obtaining completed bookings and valid tickets at no cost. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15256 | 2 Ninjaforms, Wordpress | 2 Ninja Forms, Wordpress | 2026-08-07 | 4.8 Medium |
| The Ninja Forms WordPress plugin before 3.14.10 does not prevent user-supplied query-string input, used to pre-populate a form field's default value, from being processed as a shortcode, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes registered on the site when a form so configured is embedded on a public page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13342 | 2026-08-07 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Security Optimizer WordPress plugin from 1.5.8 to 1.6.4 does not correctly validate requests to its optional IP-based login restriction feature, allowing the restriction to be bypassed so that unauthenticated requests from non-allowlisted IP addresses can reach and use the login form, defeating the access control the administrator configured. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15149 | 2 Wordpress, Wp Hotel Booking | 2 Wordpress, Wp Hotel Booking | 2026-08-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| The WP Hotel Booking WordPress plugin before 2.3.3 does not ensure that room quantities and the resulting order total are non-negative when placing a booking, and relies on client-controlled cart data, allowing unauthenticated users to create confirmed reservations for free or at an arbitrarily reduced price. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15208 | 2 Registrationmagic, Wordpress | 2 Registrationmagic, Wordpress | 2026-08-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| The RegistrationMagic WordPress plugin before 6.0.9.5 does not compare the verified PayPal capture's amount, currency, payee, or prior use against the registration it is finalising: its server-side check only confirms the capture status is COMPLETED. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore finalise an expensive paid registration with any genuinely-completed low-value capture, and replay a single capture across unlimited registrations because captures are not de-duplicated. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15147 | 2026-08-07 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Five Star Restaurant Reservations WordPress plugin before 2.7.23 does not verify the authenticity of incoming payment notifications, failing to validate the payment recipient, amount, and status or to bind the notification to the intended booking, allowing unauthenticated attackers to mark arbitrary pending reservations as paid and confirmed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10524 | 2026-08-07 | 7.5 High | ||
| The CoCart WordPress plugin before 4.9.0 does not validate a user-supplied price value against the actual product price when items are added to the cart through one of its public REST API endpoints, allowing unauthenticated users to set arbitrary product prices and complete WooCommerce orders at manipulated totals. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61477 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Nvidia | 2026-08-07 | 2.3 Low |
| An injection vulnerability was found in libvirt's virtual network driver. The network XML parser does not strip newline characters from DNS TXT record value attributes and SRV record domain/target attributes. These values are written verbatim into the dnsmasq configuration file generated by the network driver, allowing a user with permission to define virtual networks to inject arbitrary dnsmasq configuration directives such as dhcp-script, leading to arbitrary command execution as root. | ||||