Export limit exceeded: 389497 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 389497 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (389497 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-87060 | 2026-09-08 | 2.6 Low | ||
| A flaw was found in olm-operator-konflux-sample. The system's automated merging of updates, known as Renovate automerge, is configured too broadly, allowing a wide range of updates without sufficient scrutiny. Additionally, the critical base image for the catalog, ose-operator-registry, is entirely excluded from this update tracking. This combination creates an inconsistent and potentially insecure update process, increasing the risk of unpatched vulnerabilities being introduced into the system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87058 | 2026-09-08 | 2.6 Low | ||
| A flaw was found in olm-operator-konflux-sample. The hermetic build mode is disabled by default, allowing bundle builds to perform live network fetches. This means that external, unverified resources can be pulled during the build process, potentially compromising the integrity and trustworthiness of the resulting software artifacts. This introduces a supply chain risk where the final product might contain unintended or malicious code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87057 | 2026-09-08 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| A flaw was found in olm-operator-konflux-sample. The build pipelines use mutable floating tags to reference runtime base images instead of immutable SHA256 digests. This configuration allows for the content of the base images to be altered without detection, potentially leading to the introduction of malicious code or unexpected changes in the build process. An attacker could exploit this to compromise the integrity of the software supply chain. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87055 | 2026-09-08 | 2.6 Low | ||
| A flaw was found in operator-sdk-builder. The software uses a flexible label, called a mutable tag, to identify its base container image instead of a unique, fixed identifier. This practice allows the underlying base image to change unexpectedly between builds. Such a change could introduce vulnerabilities or malicious code into the build process, posing a supply chain integrity risk. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87054 | 2026-09-08 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| A flaw was found in operator-sdk-builder. The containers-policy.json configuration file defaults to insecureAcceptAnything for container image registries that are not explicitly listed. This default setting causes signature verification to be entirely skipped for images pulled from these unlisted registries, which could allow for the use of untrusted or malicious container images. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87053 | 2026-09-08 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| A flaw was found in operator-sdk-builder. Due to an oversight in the Containerfile configuration, the final built container image runs with root privileges by default. This increases the attack surface of the container, as any process executed within it will have elevated permissions. If a malicious actor compromises the container, they could leverage these root privileges to perform unauthorized actions, potentially leading to a broader system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87051 | 2026-09-08 | 2.6 Low | ||
| A flaw was found in operator-foundry. The path-containment check, designed to restrict file access within a build context, only performs string-based validation. It fails to resolve symbolic links (symlinks), allowing an attacker to create a symlink within the build context that points to files or directories outside of it. This could enable unauthorized access to files beyond the intended confinement. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87050 | 2026-09-08 | 4.2 Medium | ||
| A flaw was found in operator-foundry. GitHub Actions and reusable workflows within the component are referenced using mutable tags (e.g., `@v0`, `@v4`) instead of fixed commit SHAs. This allows an attacker to potentially alter the code executed in the Continuous Integration (CI) pipeline through an upstream compromise or by re-pointing a tag, leading to unauthorized code execution or manipulation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87049 | 2026-09-08 | 8.7 High | ||
| A flaw was found in operator-foundry. Untrusted external actors can exploit over-permissive GitHub access tokens and Google Cloud Platform (GCP) Workload Identity Federation credentials granted to a third-party reusable workflow. By invoking this workflow on untrusted-triggerable events without sufficient authorization checks, an attacker could gain highly privileged access to GitHub and cloud resources, potentially leading to unauthorized control. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52251 | 1 Provectus | 1 Ui | 2026-09-08 | 8.8 High |
| An issue discovered in provectus kafka-ui 0.4.0 through 0.7.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the q parameter of /api/clusters/local/topics/{topic}/messages. No fixed release is available; the project has had no commit since 2024-04-08. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13608 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-09-08 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw in the libcurl SASL negotiation for LDAP authentication allows an incomplete handshake sequence to be misinterpreted as a successful cryptographic verification. An attacker executing a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack can inject a premature or shortcut response that bypasses complete peer validation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19931 | 1 Curl | 1 Curl | 2026-09-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| A flaw in libcurl makes it wrongly reuse an HTTP connection setup for a given hostname using Negotiate authentication, when the initial request is done using empty credentials. This can make user B's request get sent over user A's previously authenticated connection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85384 | 2026-09-08 | N/A | ||
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the httpd component of RE210 AC750 due to improper bounds checking in the splitString function when processing an uploaded configuration file. An authenticated attacker on the local network can upload a crafted configuration file to trigger the overflow, leading to remote code execution. Successful exploitation may allow unauthorized access to sensitive information, modification of device configuration and network behavior, or disruption of device availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30368 | 1 Lightspeed | 1 Lightspeed Classroom | 2026-09-08 | 5.4 Medium |
| A client-side authorization flaw in Lightspeed Systems Classroom v5.1.2.1763770643 allows unauthenticated attackers to impersonate users by bypassing integrity checks and abusing client-generated authorization tokens, leading to unauthorized control and monitoring of student devices. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84392 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy | 2026-09-08 | 2.5 Low |
| A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability [CWE-476] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.9.0, FortiPAM 1.8 all versions, FortiPAM 1.7 all versions, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to crash the httpsd daemon via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22575 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortimanager, Fortimanagercloud | 2026-09-08 | 4.7 Medium |
| An improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.10, FortiManager Cloud 7.2 all versions may allow an administrator to bypass the approval process for workflow sessions via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84393 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2026-09-08 | 7.3 High |
| A improper validation of certificate with host mismatch vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.6.2 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-69642 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Skype For Business Server 2015, Skype For Business Server 2019, Skype For Business Server Subscription Edition | 2026-09-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Skype for Business allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66305 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Skype For Business Server 2015, Skype For Business Server 2019, Skype For Business Server Subscription Edition | 2026-09-08 | 7.1 High |
| Use of client-side authentication in Skype for Business allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63523 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Skype For Business Server 2015, Skype For Business Server 2019, Skype For Business Server Subscription Edition | 2026-09-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Skype for Business allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||