Export limit exceeded: 19368 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9323 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-7398 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 2 Dir-615 Firmware, Dir-615 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| D-Link DIR-615 HW: T1 FW:20.09 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. This enables an attacker to perform an unwanted action on a wireless router for which the user/admin is currently authenticated, as demonstrated by changing the Security option from WPA2 to None, or changing the hiddenSSID parameter, SSID parameter, or a security-option password. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6918 | 1 Bigtreecms | 1 Bigtree Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.2.16 with the value[#][*] parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Navigation Social can be changed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6917 | 1 Bigtreecms | 1 Bigtree Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.2.16 with the value parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Colophon can be changed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6916 | 1 Bigtreecms | 1 Bigtree Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.1.18 with the nav-social[#] parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Navigation Social can be changed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6915 | 1 Bigtreecms | 1 Bigtree Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.1.18 with the colophon parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Colophon can be changed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6914 | 1 Bigtreecms | 1 Bigtree Cms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.1.18 and 4.2.16 with the id parameter to the admin/ajax/users/delete/ page. A user can be deleted. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6819 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In WordPress before 4.7.3, there is cross-site request forgery (CSRF) in Press This (wp-admin/includes/class-wp-press-this.php), leading to excessive use of server resources. The CSRF can trigger an outbound HTTP request for a large file that is then parsed by Press This. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9519 | 1 Atmail | 1 Atmail | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| atmail before 7.8.0.2 has CSRF, allowing an attacker to create a user account. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6803 | 1 Solarwinds | 1 Ftp Voyager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the web interface in the Scheduler in SolarWinds (formerly Serv-U) FTP Voyager 16.2.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) change the admin password, (2) terminate the scheduler, or (3) possibly execute arbitrary commands via crafted requests to Admin/XML/Result.xml. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6756 | 1 Cisco | 1 Prime Collaboration Provisioning | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Web UI Application of the Cisco Prime Collaboration Provisioning Tool through 12.2 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute unwanted actions. The vulnerability is due to a lack of defense against cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by forcing the user's browser to perform any action authorized for that user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc90280. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6411 | 1 Dlink | 2 Dsl-2730u, Dsl-2730u Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on D-Link DSL-2730U C1 IN_1.00 devices allows remote attackers to change the DNS or firewall configuration or any password. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6379 | 1 Drupal | 1 Drupal | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Some administrative paths in Drupal 8.2.x before 8.2.7 did not include protection for CSRF. This would allow an attacker to disable some blocks on a site. This issue is mitigated by the fact that users would have to know the block ID. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6366 | 1 Netgear | 5 Dgn2200 Firmware, Dgn2200v1, Dgn2200v2 and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NETGEAR DGN2200 routers with firmware 10.0.0.20 through 10.0.0.50 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that perform DNS lookups via the host_name parameter to dnslookup.cgi. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2017-6334 to execute arbitrary code remotely. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6328 | 1 Symantec | 1 Message Gateway | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Symantec Messaging Gateway before 10.6.3-267 can encounter an issue of cross site request forgery (also known as one-click attack and is abbreviated as CSRF or XSRF), which is a type of malicious exploit of a website where unauthorized commands are transmitted from a user that the web application trusts. A CSRF attack attempts to exploit the trust that a specific website has in a user's browser. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5943 | 1 Bestpractical | 1 Request Tracker | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Request Tracker (RT) 4.x before 4.0.25, 4.2.x before 4.2.14, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information about cross-site request forgery (CSRF) verification tokens via a crafted URL. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5891 | 1 Asus | 2 Rt-ac1750, Rt-ac1750 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| ASUS RT-AC* and RT-N* devices with firmware before 3.0.0.4.380.7378 have Login Page CSRF and Save Settings CSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5874 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 2 Dir-600m Firmware, Dir-600m | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| CSRF exists on D-Link DIR-600M Rev. Cx devices before v3.05ENB01_beta_20170306. This can be used to bypass authentication and insert XSS sequences or possibly have unspecified other impact. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5264 | 1 Rapid7 | 1 Nexpose | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Versions of Nexpose prior to 6.4.66 fail to adequately validate the source of HTTP requests intended for the Automated Actions administrative web application, and are susceptible to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5263 | 1 Cambiumnetworks | 10 Cnpilot E400, Cnpilot E400 Firmware, Cnpilot E410 and 7 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Versions 4.3.2-R4 and prior of Cambium Networks cnPilot firmware lack CSRF controls that can mitigate the effects of CSRF attacks, which are most typically implemented as randomized per-session tokens associated with any web application function, especially destructive ones. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5244 | 1 Rapid7 | 1 Metasploit | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Routes used to stop running Metasploit tasks (either particular ones or all tasks) allowed GET requests. Only POST requests should have been allowed, as the stop/stop_all routes change the state of the service. This could have allowed an attacker to stop currently-running Metasploit tasks by getting an authenticated user to execute JavaScript. As of Metasploit 4.14.0 (Update 2017061301), the routes for stopping tasks only allow POST requests, which validate the presence of a secret token to prevent CSRF attacks. | ||||