Export limit exceeded: 380866 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (77 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-7663 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-06-30 | 9.1 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.6 could allow unauthenticated attackers to access protected MCP project resources and execute MCP operations due to improper authorization enforcement in the Streamable MCP transport endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7803 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-06-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 could allow arbitrary code execution due to improper validation of flow nodes with missing or empty component type fields. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7874 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-06-30 | 9.1 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow could allow disclosure of all stored credentials due to the use of a weak and reversible key derivation mechanism for encryption at rest. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10561 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-06-23 | 10 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 has an vulnerability due to an improper isolation of Python execution combined with an authentication bypass that allows an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the host system, resulting in complete compromise | ||||
| CVE-2026-7664 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-06-23 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 could allow unauthenticated attackers to access protected MCP project resources and execute MCP operations due to improper authorization enforcement in the Streamable MCP transport endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3341 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Desktop, Langflow Desktop | 2026-06-16 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.9.2 IBM Langflow is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7787 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-06-16 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.1 could allow an authenticated user to read or modify sensitive information by bypassing authentication using insecure direct object references. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7524 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-06-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.1 could allow remote code execution due to improper validation of symbolic links during archive extraction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7528 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-06-02 | 7.1 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.9.0 could allow a denial of service due to uncontrolled resource consumption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4503 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Desktop, Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 Langflow could allow an unauthenticated user to view other users' images due to an indirect object reference through a user-controlled key. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4502 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Desktop, Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.2.0 through 1.8.4 Langflow could allow an authenticated attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to write arbitrary files on the system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3346 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Desktop, Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | 6.4 Medium |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.6.0 through 1.8.4 Lanflow is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3340 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Desktop, Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 IBM Langflow is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3345 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Desktop, Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow Desktop <=1.8.4 Langflow could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot" sequences (/../) to view arbitrary files on the system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6543 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Desktop, Langflow Desktop | 2026-05-11 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 Langflow allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the process running Langflow. This allows reading sensitive environment variables (API keys, DB credentials), modifying files, or launching further attacks on the internal network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6542 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-05-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.8.4 could allow any user to supply a flow_id to read transaction logs and vertex build data belonging to other users, and to delete persisted vertex build data for another user's flow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3357 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Desktop, Langflow | 2026-04-14 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.6.0 through 1.8.2 Langflow could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by an insecure default setting which permits the deserialization of untrusted data in the FAISS component. | ||||