Export limit exceeded: 370156 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (3144 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-5642 | 1 Apache | 1 Ambari | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| During installation of Ambari 2.4.0 through 2.4.2, Ambari Server artifacts are not created with proper ACLs. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12629 | 4 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 9 Solr, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 6 more | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Remote code execution occurs in Apache Solr before 7.1 with Apache Lucene before 7.1 by exploiting XXE in conjunction with use of a Config API add-listener command to reach the RunExecutableListener class. Elasticsearch, although it uses Lucene, is NOT vulnerable to this. Note that the XML external entity expansion vulnerability occurs in the XML Query Parser which is available, by default, for any query request with parameters deftype=xmlparser and can be exploited to upload malicious data to the /upload request handler or as Blind XXE using ftp wrapper in order to read arbitrary local files from the Solr server. Note also that the second vulnerability relates to remote code execution using the RunExecutableListener available on all affected versions of Solr. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12624 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Cxf, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Single Sign On | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache CXF supports sending and receiving attachments via either the JAX-WS or JAX-RS specifications. It is possible to craft a message attachment header that could lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack on a CXF web service provider. Both JAX-WS and JAX-RS services are vulnerable to this attack. From Apache CXF 3.2.1 and 3.1.14, message attachment headers that are greater than 300 characters will be rejected by default. This value is configurable via the property "attachment-max-header-size". | ||||
| CVE-2017-5640 | 1 Apache | 1 Impala | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| It was noticed that a malicious process impersonating an Impala daemon in Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0 to 2.8.0 could cause Impala daemons to skip authentication checks when Kerberos is enabled (but TLS is not). If the malicious server responds with 'COMPLETE' before the SASL handshake has completed, the client will consider the handshake as completed even though no exchange of credentials has happened. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5643 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Camel, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Camel's Validation Component is vulnerable against SSRF via remote DTDs and XXE. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12612 | 1 Apache | 1 Spark | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Spark 1.6.0 until 2.1.1, the launcher API performs unsafe deserialization of data received by its socket. This makes applications launched programmatically using the launcher API potentially vulnerable to arbitrary code execution by an attacker with access to any user account on the local machine. It does not affect apps run by spark-submit or spark-shell. The attacker would be able to execute code as the user that ran the Spark application. Users are encouraged to update to version 2.2.0 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12613 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 17 Portable Runtime, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 14 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.1 High |
| When apr_time_exp*() or apr_os_exp_time*() functions are invoked with an invalid month field value in Apache Portable Runtime APR 1.6.2 and prior, out of bounds memory may be accessed in converting this value to an apr_time_exp_t value, potentially revealing the contents of a different static heap value or resulting in program termination, and may represent an information disclosure or denial of service vulnerability to applications which call these APR functions with unvalidated external input. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12607 | 2 Apache, Debian | 2 Openoffice, Debian Linux | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability in OpenOffice's PPT file parser before 4.1.4, and specifically in PPTStyleSheet, allows attackers to craft malicious documents that cause denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7661 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf Fediz | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache CXF Fediz ships with a number of container-specific plugins to enable WS-Federation for applications. A CSRF (Cross Style Request Forgery) style vulnerability has been found in the Spring 2, Spring 3, Jetty 8 and Jetty 9 plugins in Apache CXF Fediz prior to 1.4.0, 1.3.2 and 1.2.4. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12608 | 2 Apache, Debian | 2 Openoffice, Debian Linux | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability in Apache OpenOffice Writer DOC file parser before 4.1.4, and specifically in ImportOldFormatStyles, allows attackers to craft malicious documents that cause denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9802 | 1 Apache | 1 Sling Servlets Post | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Javascript method Sling.evalString() in Apache Sling Servlets Post before 2.3.22 uses the javascript 'eval' function to parse input strings, which allows for XSS attacks by passing specially crafted input strings. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6800 | 1 Apache | 1 Ofbiz | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The default configuration of the Apache OFBiz framework offers a blog functionality. Different users are able to operate blogs which are related to specific parties. In the form field for the creation of new blog articles the user input of the summary field as well as the article field is not properly sanitized. It is possible to inject arbitrary JavaScript code in these form fields. This code gets executed from the browser of every user who is visiting this article. Mitigation: Upgrade to Apache OFBiz 16.11.01. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5002 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Xml-rpc, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the Apache XML-RPC (aka ws-xmlrpc) library 3.1.3, as used in Apache Archiva, allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted DTD. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6806 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Wicket 6.x before 6.25.0, 7.x before 7.5.0, and 8.0.0-M1 provide a CSRF prevention measure that fails to discover some cross origin requests. The mitigation is to not only check the Origin HTTP header, but also take the Referer HTTP header into account when no Origin was provided. Furthermore, not all Wicket server side targets were subjected to the CSRF check. This was also fixed. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0880 | 1 Apache | 1 Xerces-c\+\+ | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Xerces-C++ allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted message sent to an XML service that causes hash table collisions. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0803 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The WS-SP UsernameToken policy in Apache CXF 2.4.5 and 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending an empty UsernameToken as part of a SOAP request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9806 | 1 Apache | 1 Openoffice | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability in the OpenOffice Writer DOC file parser before 4.1.4, and specifically in the WW8Fonts Constructor, allows attackers to craft malicious documents that cause denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9801 | 1 Apache | 1 Commons Email | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| When a call-site passes a subject for an email that contains line-breaks in Apache Commons Email 1.0 through 1.4, the caller can add arbitrary SMTP headers. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5003 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Ws-xmlrpc, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Apache XML-RPC (aka ws-xmlrpc) library 3.1.3, as used in Apache Archiva, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java object in an <ex:serializable> element. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9799 | 1 Apache | 1 Storm | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| It was found that under some situations and configurations of Apache Storm 1.x before 1.0.4 and 1.1.x before 1.1.1, it is theoretically possible for the owner of a topology to trick the supervisor to launch a worker as a different, non-root, user. In the worst case this could lead to secure credentials of the other user being compromised. | ||||