Export limit exceeded: 355048 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (544 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-26454 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In validateUriSchemeAndPermission of DisclaimersParserImpl.java , there is a possible way to access data from another user due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32321 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In isSafeIntent of AccountTypePreferenceLoader.java, there is a possible way to bypass an intent type check due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32324 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In onCommand of ActivityManagerShellCommand.java, there is a possible arbitrary activity launch due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32326 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of AppRestrictionsFragment.java, there is a possible way to bypass intent security check due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32346 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In onActivityResult of VoicemailSettingsActivity.java, there is a possible work profile contact number leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48532 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.3 High |
| In markMediaAsFavorite of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible way to bypass the WRITE_EXTERNAL_STORAGE permission due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32320 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In System UI, there is a possible way to view other users' images due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61884 | 1 Oracle | 1 Configurator | 2026-02-26 | 7.5 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Configurator product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Runtime UI). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.14. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Configurator. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Configurator accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2025-22420 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to leak audio files across user profiles due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48536 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In grantAllowlistedPackagePermissions of SettingsSliceProvider.java, there is a possible way for a third party app to modify secure settings due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48555 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of NotificationStation.java, there is a possible cross-profile information disclosure due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48586 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In onActivityResult of EditFdnContactScreen.java, there is a possible way to leak contacts from the work profile due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48628 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-02-26 | 7.8 High |
| In validateIconUserBoundary of PrintManagerService.java, there is a possible cross-user image leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2023-46846 | 2 Redhat, Squid-cache | 13 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Enterprise Linux For Arm 64 and 10 more | 2026-02-25 | 9.3 Critical |
| SQUID is vulnerable to HTTP request smuggling, caused by chunked decoder lenience, allows a remote attacker to perform Request/Response smuggling past firewall and frontend security systems. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22536 | 1 Sap | 3 Content Server, Netweaver Application Server Abap, Web Dispatcher | 2026-02-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP, SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java, ABAP Platform, SAP Content Server 7.53 and SAP Web Dispatcher are vulnerable for request smuggling and request concatenation. An unauthenticated attacker can prepend a victim's request with arbitrary data. This way, the attacker can execute functions impersonating the victim or poison intermediary Web caches. A successful attack could result in complete compromise of Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability of the system. | ||||
| CVE-2021-38162 | 1 Sap | 1 Web Dispatcher | 2026-02-24 | 8.9 High |
| SAP Web Dispatcher versions - 7.49, 7.53, 7.77, 7.81, KRNL64NUC - 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, KRNL64UC -7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.53, KERNEL - 7.22, 7.49, 7.53, 7.77, 7.81, 7.83 processes allow an unauthenticated attacker to submit a malicious crafted request over a network to a front-end server which may, over several attempts, result in a back-end server confusing the boundaries of malicious and legitimate messages. This can result in the back-end server executing a malicious payload which can be used to read or modify any information on the server or consume server resources making it temporarily unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0752 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift Service Mesh, Service Mesh | 2026-02-24 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6.3 and 2.5.6. Rate-limiter avoidance, access-control bypass, CPU and memory exhaustion, and replay attacks may be possible due to improper HTTP header sanitization in Envoy. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55315 | 2 Microsoft, Redhat | 4 Asp.net Core, Visual Studio, Visual Studio 2022 and 1 more | 2026-02-22 | 9.9 Critical |
| Inconsistent interpretation of http requests ('http request/response smuggling') in ASP.NET Core allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2023-28322 | 5 Apple, Fedoraproject, Haxx and 2 more | 17 Macos, Fedora, Curl and 14 more | 2026-02-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in curl <v8.1.0 when doing HTTP(S) transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback (`CURLOPT_READFUNCTION`) to ask for data to send, even when the `CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS` option has been set, if the same handle previously wasused to issue a `PUT` request which used that callback. This flaw may surprise the application and cause it to misbehave and either send off the wrong data or use memory after free or similar in the second transfer. The problem exists in the logic for a reused handle when it is (expected to be) changed from a PUT to a POST. | ||||
| CVE-2022-32221 | 6 Apple, Debian, Haxx and 3 more | 16 Macos, Debian Linux, Curl and 13 more | 2026-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| When doing HTTP(S) transfers, libcurl might erroneously use the read callback (`CURLOPT_READFUNCTION`) to ask for data to send, even when the `CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS` option has been set, if the same handle previously was used to issue a `PUT` request which used that callback. This flaw may surprise the application and cause it to misbehave and either send off the wrong data or use memory after free or similar in the subsequent `POST` request. The problem exists in the logic for a reused handle when it is changed from a PUT to a POST. | ||||