| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Tectite Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the admin_init function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including the tectite_forms_button option, via a forged request via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Remove NoFollow Commenter URL plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gmz_comment_settings_save function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's comment-display setting via a forged request via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Remove meta boxes per user role plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.01. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'remove-meta-boxes-per-user-role' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify or reset the plugin's per-role meta box visibility settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Laiser Tag plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the addOptionsPageFields function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings, including the API key, tag blacklist, relevance threshold, batch size, and tagging toggles, via a forged request via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The Google Plus One Bottom plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the googlePlusOneAdmin function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including the plusone-lang, plusone-callback, and plusone-url options stored in the database via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| The BirdSeed plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation in the birdseed_plugin_settings_page() function. The function processes the 'birdseed_token' GET parameter and saves it to the database via update_option() without verifying a nonce. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's BirdSeed token setting via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking a link. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Gosoft Software Proticaret E-Commerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.
This issue affects Proticaret E-Commerce: before v6.0
NOTE: According to the vendor, fixing process is still ongoing for v4.05. |
| PHP-SHOP 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to add administrative users by crafting malicious HTML forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into visiting a page containing a hidden form that automatically submits POST requests to the users.php endpoint with parameters like name, email, password, and permissions set to admin to create unauthorized admin accounts. |
| HaPe PKH 1.1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to change administrator passwords by submitting forged requests to the user update endpoint. Attackers can craft malicious forms targeting the aksi_user.php script with parameters like id_user, password, and level to modify admin credentials without authentication. |
| The DeepAI endpoint 'https://api.deepai.org/change_user_email' accepts POST requests without any CSRF protection. If an attacker can trick a logged-in user into clicking a malicious link, the attacker can change the user's email address and take over their account. Fixed on 2026-05-20. |
| ZeusCart 4.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of victims by crafting malicious requests. Attackers can deactivate customer accounts via the admin interface by tricking users into visiting attacker-controlled pages that submit requests to the regstatus endpoint with action=deny parameters. |
| WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In 29.0 and earlier, there is a cross-site request forgery vulnerability on the 2FA toggle. plugin/LoginControl/set.json.php accepts POST type=set2FA value=false, calls LoginControl::setUser2FA(User::getId(), false) on the session-authenticated user, and returns. There is no forbidIfIsUntrustedRequest() call, no isTokenValid() check, no X-CSRF-Token/SameSite enforcement, and no re-authentication step. A cross-origin page that the victim visits while logged into the AVideo dashboard issues the POST via a hidden form (or fetch without credentials:"omit") and disables the victim's 2FA in one request. |
| JupyterHub is software that allows users to create a multi-user server for Jupyter notebooks. In versions 4.1.0 through 5.4.4, XSRF protection (updated in 4.1.0) inappropriately treated requests with Sec-Fetch-Mode: no-cors as same-origin requests, bypassing XSRF checks. The JSON API is not affected, only HTTP form endpoints, such as /hub/spawn and /hub/accept-share, meaning attackers could trigger server spawn (but not access the server) and if the attacker is a JupyterHub user permitted to share access to their server, cause a user to accept a share and have access to the attacker's server. This issue has been fixed in version 5.4.5. If developers are unable to immediately upgrade, they can temporarily mitigate this issue by dropping requests to JupyterHub with Sec-Fetch-Mode: no-cors if they are using a reverse proxy. |
| SOPlanning is vulnerable to Cross‑Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in groupe_save create, modify and delete endpoints. An attacker can craft a malicious website that, when visited by an authenticated user, automatically sends a forged GET or POST request to the application.
This issue affects SOPlanning version 1.55 and below. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was discovered in the delete.php endpoint of Jason2605 AdminPanel 4.0. |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Multijob Plugin 662.vd2e0001f6b_b_d and earlier allows attackers to resume failed Multijob builds. |
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins GitHub Integration Plugin 0.7.3 and earlier allows attackers to attackers to trigger a build for a pull request. |
| The PeachPay — Payments & Express Checkout for WooCommerce (supports Stripe, PayPal, Square, Authorize.net, NMI) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.120.46. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the peachpay_stripe_handle_admin_actions function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to permanently delete all stored Stripe credentials — including publishable keys, secret keys, webhook secrets, and Apple Pay configuration — from the WordPress database, disabling Stripe payment processing for the store via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Vulnerability in Oracle REST Data Services (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 24.2.0-26.1.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle REST Data Services. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle REST Data Services, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle REST Data Services accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle REST Data Services accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle REST Data Services. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.9 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L). |
| Lack of CSRF token validation lead to a CSRF attack vector in the admin activation endpoint of com_users. |
