Export limit exceeded: 393736 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 393736 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (393736 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-88860 | 1 Cap-go | 1 Cap-go | 2026-09-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| Capgo fails to clean up channel permission overrides when a user's last organization role binding is deleted, leaving stale overrides active. Attackers can retain channel-specific permissions after their base RBAC access has been revoked to perform unauthorized actions like changing production OTA versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88862 | 1 Cap-go | 1 Cap-go | 2026-09-13 | 8.8 High |
| Capgo (capgo.app) backend through 12.242.4 does not validate parent-child delegation when processing the x-limited-key-id header. checkKeyByIdPg() in supabase/functions/_backend/utils/hono_middleware.ts resolves the attacker-supplied numeric API key ID using only the key ID, its expiration state, and the authenticating key's user_id, while hasLimitedRbacSubkeyScope() accepts any key with a non-organization (e.g., app-scoped) RBAC binding and validateSubkeyUser() only compares owning user IDs. Because Capgo treats API keys as independent RBAC principals with separate role bindings, an authenticated apikey_manager API key with no application access can supply the numeric ID of a more privileged same-owner key and have the middleware replace the authenticated principal and effective API-key secret with that key (setSubkeyAuthContext), exercising an app_admin sibling's permissions without knowing or submitting its secret. The issue was reproduced on release 12.242.4 (commit b3d02cdbc23ac59990785acacd1f113c07458568) after the fix for GHSA-8h52-44r7-w343; at the time of the advisory no patched version was available. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88863 | 1 Cap-go | 1 Cap-go | 2026-09-13 | 8.1 High |
| capgo.app (npm package `capgo`) through version 12.207.1 does not compare the caller's role rank against the requested role in the validateInvite() function of supabase/functions/_backend/private/invite_new_user_to_org.ts. The POST /private/invite_new_user_to_org endpoint only requires the org.update_user_roles permission for org_super_admin invitations, so an authenticated user holding only the org.invite_user permission (e.g., an org_member) can invite an external user as org_admin or org_billing_admin. When the invited account accepts the invitation via POST /private/accept_invitation, ensureOrgMembership creates the role binding using the Supabase service-role key, which bypasses the prevent_role_binding_priority_escalation and check_org_user_privileges database triggers. This allows privilege escalation resulting in full administrative control over the organization's apps, channels, members, and billing. The issue is addressed by pull request #3096, which compares the inviter's rank before permitting elevated invitations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88864 | 1 Cap-go | 1 Cap-go | 2026-09-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| Capgo (capgo.app) fails to restrict direct write access to the public.sso_providers table exposed through Supabase PostgREST. A holder of an ordinary Capgo full API key can insert a row with status='active' and enforce_sso=true, bypassing the intended backend SSO provisioning route (supabase/functions/_backend/private/sso/providers.ts) and its controls: the Enterprise plan requirement, SSO provider creation via the Supabase Management API, DNS TXT domain-ownership verification, the pending_verification → verified → active status transition, and issuance of a trusted provider ID by Supabase Auth. The forged row is trusted by SSO discovery and enforcement logic, including the unauthenticated login preflight endpoint /private/sso/check-domain, which then reports {"has_sso": true, "enforce_sso": true} for domains that were never verified, allowing attacker-controlled SSO enforcement to be asserted for arbitrary domains and disrupting normal login. All versions are affected; at the time of the advisory no patch was available. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75584 | 1 Nasajpl | 1 Iondtn | 2026-09-13 | 7.5 High |
| ION-DTN before 4.2.1-a.1 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to crash the ION process by sending a BPv7 bundle with a zero-length payload. The canonicalizePayloadBlock() function in bpsec_util.c passes bundle->payload.length to zco_clone() without validating it against zero, causing a failed CHKZERO assertion that triggers sm_Abort() and terminates the process with SIGABRT before any HMAC verification occurs, requiring no valid key or credential to exploit. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66632 | 2 Replywp, Wordpress | 2 Simple Cloudfare Turnstile, Wordpress | 2026-09-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Content Injection in Simple Cloudflare Turnstile <= 1.42.1 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66674 | 2 Replywp, Wordpress | 2 Simple Cloudfare Turnstile, Wordpress | 2026-09-13 | 5.6 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Bypass Vulnerability in Simple Cloudflare Turnstile <= 1.42.1 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81789 | 2 Maartenbelmans, Wordpress | 2 Advanced Product Fields Product Addons For Woocommerce, Wordpress | 2026-09-13 | 8.6 High |
| Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Studio Wombat Advanced Product Fields Extended for WooCommerce allows Path Traversal. This issue affects Advanced Product Fields Extended for WooCommerce: from n/a through 3.1.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81052 | 1 Dell | 1 Thinos | 2026-09-13 | 6.8 Medium |
| Dell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2605_10.2616, contain a Download of Code Without Integrity Check vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81048 | 1 Dell | 1 Thinos | 2026-09-13 | 9.6 Critical |
| Dell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2605_10.2616, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote Code execution | ||||
| CVE-2026-81049 | 1 Dell | 1 Thinos | 2026-09-13 | 4.4 Medium |
| Dell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2605_10.2616, contain a Missing Support for Integrity Check vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81467 | 1 Dell | 1 Thinos | 2026-09-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| Dell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2605_10. 2616, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81468 | 1 Dell | 1 Thinos | 2026-09-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| Dell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2605_10. 2616, contains an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81046 | 1 Dell | 1 Thinos | 2026-09-13 | 9.4 Critical |
| Dell ThinOS 10, versions prior to 2605_10.2616, contain a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Arbitrary Code Execution within the application context. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65638 | 1 Configserver | 1 Configserver Security Firewall | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| Improper escaping of a request URL in ConfigServer Security & Firewall allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands as the CSF service account via shell command injection. The vulnerability affects versions of the software originally distributed by ConfigServer, as well as versions of the WebPros-maintained fork that contain the vulnerable code. WebPros has addressed the vulnerability in version 16.30. Other forks or independently maintained versions of ConfigServer Security & Firewall (CSF) may also be affected and should be evaluated independently. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65639 | 1 Configserver | 1 Configserver Security Firewall | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| OS command injection in the advanced-rule parser of ConfigServer Security & Firewall allows a remote attacker who controls a configured allow/deny feed to execute arbitrary commands as root, due to insufficient validation of feed-supplied rule data. The vulnerability affects versions of the software originally distributed by ConfigServer, as well as versions of the WebPros-maintained fork that contain the vulnerable code. WebPros has addressed the vulnerability in version 16.30. Other forks or independently maintained versions of ConfigServer Security & Firewall (CSF) may also be affected and should be evaluated independently. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88023 | 1 Mongodb | 1 Php Library | 2026-09-13 | 8.3 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements in data query logic in the GridFS component of the MongoDB PHP Library can cause a caller-supplied structured file identifier to be interpreted as a query condition rather than as a literal identifier. An authenticated user who can influence the identifier passed by an affected application may obtain stored file content beyond the intended target or cause all GridFS file chunks in the affected bucket to be removed, rendering stored file content unreadable. The affected rename operation may also rename a stored file other than the intended target. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78807 | 1 W1.fi | 1 Wpa Supplicant | 2026-09-13 | 7.1 High |
| An issue in wpa_supplicant all versions before v.2.12 allows a local attacker to bypass proper network context and AKMP matching for PMKSA caching via missing validation in the driver based PMKSA selection path in wpa.c | ||||
| CVE-2026-11446 | 2 Arraytics, Wordpress | 2 Booktics – Booking Calendar For Appointments And Service Businesses, Wordpress | 2026-09-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Booktics – Booking Calendar for Appointments and Service Businesses plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.23. This is due to the create_order_permission() permission callback on the POST /wp-json/booktics/v1/orders REST route unconditionally returning true, combined with find_and_update_guest() overwriting an existing customer record's stored name, phone, and wp_user_id whenever the caller-supplied email matches, with no proof of ownership. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the contact details (name and phone) of any existing customer whose email address they know, poisoning downstream reminder emails, SMS, calendar invites, and CRM data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78172 | 2 Themify, Wordpress | 2 Woocommerce Product Filter, Wordpress | 2026-09-13 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Themify – WooCommerce Product Filter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via Query Parameter Name in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||