Export limit exceeded: 385852 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (385852 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-23590 | 2026-09-02 | N/A | ||
| Withdrawn by requester. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23589 | 2026-09-02 | N/A | ||
| Withdrawn by requester. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23588 | 2026-09-02 | N/A | ||
| Withdrawn by requester. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23587 | 2026-09-02 | N/A | ||
| Withdrawn by requester. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23586 | 2026-09-02 | N/A | ||
| Withdrawn by requester. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23585 | 2026-09-02 | N/A | ||
| Withdrawn by requester. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23584 | 2026-09-02 | N/A | ||
| Withdrawn by requester. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23583 | 2026-09-02 | N/A | ||
| Withdrawn by requester. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75411 | 1 Jeecgboot | 1 Jeecgboot | 2026-09-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| JeecgBoot v3.9.2 is vulnerable to Remote command execution. The CodeNode component of the AI Flow module supports Groovy script execution. While the `SecurityCheck` class employs a blacklist mechanism to intercept dangerous calls, the dynamic nature of Groovy allows this blacklist to be completely bypassed through string concatenation and reflection. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7963 | 2026-09-02 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| The Easy Waveform Player plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the shortcode_easywaveformplayer() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26897 | 2026-09-02 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| An issue in EcoOnline EHS (com.airsweb.v10) application for Android, version 0.2.499 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via the AndroidManifest.xml component | ||||
| CVE-2026-30073 | 1 Free5gc | 1 Free5gc | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| An issue in the NssaiAvailabilitySubscriptionCreate component of free5gc v4.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30612 | 2026-09-02 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| An issue in Time4 Popcorn for Windows <= 6.2.1.18 and Time4Popcorn for MacOS <= 6.2.1.17 and Time4Popcorn for Android <= 3.5.0.173 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the updater.exe for windows, PT.updd on MacOS components | ||||
| CVE-2026-51614 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the getAccessDeviceCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain access-device policy and client state information via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51615 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| Incorrect access control in the getLanCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain LAN addressing and DHCP configuration information via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51638 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the getWiFiGuestCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain guest Wi-Fi configuration information via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51654 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the getScheduleCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain schedule or scheduled-reboot configuration information via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3850 | 2 Elegant Themes, Wordpress | 2 Divi, Wordpress | 2026-09-02 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Divi theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the `redirect_url` parameter of the `et_pb_contact_form` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 4.27.6. This is due to the `redirect_url` attribute being sanitized with `esc_attr()` instead of `esc_url()` before being rendered into the `data-redirect_url` HTML data attribute. Additionally, `redirect_url` is absent from the hardcoded `$url_options` array in `class-et-builder-element.php`, so it does not receive `esc_url_raw()` sanitization during shortcode parsing. After a successful form submission, client-side JavaScript reads this data attribute and passes it directly to `window.location.href`, executing arbitrary JavaScript from a `javascript:` URI. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute whenever a user submits the contact form. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4378 | 1 Akilli Commerce Software Technologies Ltd. Co. | 1 E-commerce Pack | 2026-09-02 | 5.4 Medium |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Akilli Ticaret Software Technologies Ltd. E-Commerce Pack allows Stored XSS. This issue affects E-Commerce Pack: from 4.5.001 before 4.6.001. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75803 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-09-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| Issue summary: ChaCha20-Poly1305 and AES-OCB decryption with an empty ciphertext can report success without verifying the supplied authentication tag when the operation is finalized by calling the EVP_Cipher() function. Impact summary: Applications calling EVP_Cipher() on an empty ciphertext and expecting the call to check the AEAD tag may accept forged messages. CWE: CWE-354 (Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value) Description: The EVP_Cipher() API call for AEAD ciphers behaves like a one shot encryption and decryption call. It also verifies the AEAD tag after the decryption operation. However for AES-OCB and ChaCha20-Poly1305 ciphers it skipped the AEAD tag verification when an empty ciphertext was passed to the function. The callers of this function might believe that a successful return indicates a valid AEAD tag for these ciphers, even when that has not truly been validated in this case. FIPS impact: no The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are not affected by this CVE as the affected algorithms are not FIPS approved and thus not implemented in the FIPS module. | ||||