Export limit exceeded: 22476 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (22476 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-44826 | 1 Givanz | 1 Vvveb | 2026-05-15 | 7.5 High |
| Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.2, Vvveb CMS does not validate the sign of the quantity parameter on the cart-add endpoint. Submitting a negative integer is accepted by the server and treated as a normal positive line-item, but with the sign carried through into every downstream computation: line total, sub-total, taxes, and grand total all become negative numbers. The customer-facing cart UI then displays a negative grand total to the user, the checkout flow accepts the negative cart, and the resulting order is persisted in the merchant's database with a negative total column. From the merchant's order management dashboard, this surfaces as a real order with a negative total — an "the merchant owes the customer money" record that no legitimate workflow ever creates. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.8.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8686 | 1 Freertos | 1 Coremqtt | 2026-05-15 | 7.5 High |
| Missing bounds validation in the MQTT v5.0 property parser in coreMQTT before 5.0.1 allows an MQTT broker to cause a denial of service by sending a crafted packet. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to v5.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20782 | 1 Intel | 2 Qat Drivers, Quickassist Technology | 2026-05-15 | 6.6 Medium |
| Buffer overflow for some Intel(R) QAT software drivers for Windows before version 1.13 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow a denial of service. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable denial of service. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (low), integrity (low) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3607 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-05-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.3 before 18.9.7, 18.10 before 18.10.6, and 18.11 before 18.11.3 that could have allowed an authenticated user with developer-role permissions to bypass package protection rules due to improper access control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43348 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mshv_vtl: Fix vmemmap_shift exceeding MAX_FOLIO_ORDER When registering VTL0 memory via MSHV_ADD_VTL0_MEMORY, the kernel computes pgmap->vmemmap_shift as the number of trailing zeros in the OR of start_pfn and last_pfn, intending to use the largest compound page order both endpoints are aligned to. However, this value is not clamped to MAX_FOLIO_ORDER, so a sufficiently aligned range (e.g. physical range [0x800000000000, 0x800080000000), corresponding to start_pfn=0x800000000 with 35 trailing zeros) can produce a shift larger than what memremap_pages() accepts, triggering a WARN and returning -EINVAL: WARNING: ... memremap_pages+0x512/0x650 requested folio size unsupported The MAX_FOLIO_ORDER check was added by commit 646b67d57589 ("mm/memremap: reject unreasonable folio/compound page sizes in memremap_pages()"). Fix this by clamping vmemmap_shift to MAX_FOLIO_ORDER so we always request the largest order the kernel supports, in those cases, rather than an out-of-range value. Also fix the error path to propagate the actual error code from devm_memremap_pages() instead of hard-coding -EFAULT, which was masking the real -EINVAL return. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43345 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-15 | 7.5 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ipa: fix event ring index not programmed for IPA v5.0+ For IPA v5.0+, the event ring index field moved from CH_C_CNTXT_0 to CH_C_CNTXT_1. The v5.0 register definition intended to define this field in the CH_C_CNTXT_1 fmask array but used the old identifier of ERINDEX instead of CH_ERINDEX. Without a valid event ring, GSI channels could never signal transfer completions. This caused gsi_channel_trans_quiesce() to block forever in wait_for_completion(). At least for IPA v5.2 this resolves an issue seen where runtime suspend, system suspend, and remoteproc stop all hanged forever. It also meant the IPA data path was completely non functional. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44310 | 1 Sigstore | 1 Gitsign | 2026-05-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| Gitsign is a keyless Sigstore to signing tool for Git commits with your a GitHub / OIDC identity. From 0.4.0 to before 0.15.0, CertVerifier.Verify() in pkg/git/verifier.go unconditionally dereferences certs[0] after sd.GetCertificates() without checking the slice length. A CMS/PKCS7 signed message with an empty certificate set is a structurally valid DER payload; GetCertificates() returns an empty slice with no error, causing an immediate index-out-of-range panic. On the gitsign --verify code path (the GPG-compatible mode invoked by git verify-commit), the panic is silently recovered by internal/io/streams.go's Wrap() function, which returns nil instead of an error. main.go then exits with code 0, causing exit-code-only verification callers to interpret the failed verification as success. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.15.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66660 | 1 Amd | 12 Instinct Mi210, Instinct Mi250, Instinct Mi300a and 9 more | 2026-05-15 | N/A |
| Insufficient parameter sanitization in TEE SOC Driver could allow an attacker to issue a malformed DRV_SOC_CMD_ID_SRIOV_CHECK_TA_COMPAT to cause incorrect shared memory mapping, potentially resulting in unexpected behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41089 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2012 (server Core Installation), Windows Server 2012 R2 and 12 more | 2026-05-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Netlogon allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41096 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 11 22h3, Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 23h2 and 12 more | 2026-05-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Windows DNS allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-37532 | 2 Automotivelinux, Linuxfoundation | 2 Agl-service-can-low-level, Automotive Grade Linux | 2026-05-15 | 7.1 High |
| AGL agl-service-can-low-level thru 17.1.12 contains a heap buffer over-read in the isotp-c library. In isotp_continue_receive (receive.c:87-89), the payload_length for a Single Frame is extracted from a 4-bit nibble in the CAN frame data, yielding values 0-15. However, a standard CAN frame is only 8 bytes, with payload starting at data[1] (7 bytes available). When payload_length exceeds the available data (e.g., nibble=15 but only 7 payload bytes exist), memcpy(message.payload, &data[1], payload_length) reads up to 8 bytes past the end of the data buffer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40398 | 1 Microsoft | 30 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 27 more | 2026-05-15 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Remote Desktop allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40403 | 1 Microsoft | 30 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 27 more | 2026-05-15 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Win32K - GRFX allows an authorized attacker to execute code locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0045 | 2026-05-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper Input validation in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) PCI driver may allow a local attacker to create a buffer overflow condition, potentially resulting in a crash or denial of service | ||||
| CVE-2024-36345 | 2026-05-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper input validation in the AMD OverDrive (AOD) System Management Mode (SMM) module could allow a privileged attacker to perform an out-of-bounds read, potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43304 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: define and enforce CEPH_MAX_KEY_LEN When decoding the key, verify that the key material would fit into a fixed-size buffer in process_auth_done() and generally has a sane length. The new CEPH_MAX_KEY_LEN check replaces the existing check for a key with no key material which is a) not universal since CEPH_CRYPTO_NONE has to be excluded and b) doesn't provide much value since a smaller than needed key is just as invalid as no key -- this has to be handled elsewhere anyway. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23827 | 2 Arubanetworks, Hpe | 3 Arubaos, Sd-wan, Arubaos | 2026-05-15 | 7.5 High |
| A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in a Network management service of AOS-8 and AOS-10 that could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to achieve remote code execution. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system, potentially leading to a system compromise. Exploitation may also result in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition affecting the impacted system process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41963 | 1 Huawei | 1 Harmonyos | 2026-05-15 | 2.8 Low |
| Stack overflow vulnerability in the media platform. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0044 | 1 Amd | 8 Amd Ryzen™ Ai 300 Series Processors, Radeon Pro W7000 Series, Radeon Rx 7000 Series and 5 more | 2026-05-15 | N/A |
| An out-of-bounds read in power management firmware by a malicious local attacker with low privileges could potentially lead to a partial loss of confidentiality and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21950 | 1 Amd | 4 Instinct Mi300a, Instinct Mi300x, Instinct Mi308x and 1 more | 2026-05-15 | N/A |
| An out of bounds read in the remote management firmware could allow a privileged attacker read a limited section of memory outside of established bounds potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality or availability. | ||||