Export limit exceeded: 15927 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (15927 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-2148 | 3 Busybox, Canonical, Debian | 3 Busybox, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the DHCP client (udhcpc) in BusyBox before 1.25.0 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving OPTION_6RD parsing. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5200 | 2 Google, Redhat | 2 Chrome, Rhel Extras | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| V8 in Google Chrome prior to 54.0.2840.98 for Mac, and 54.0.2840.99 for Windows, and 54.0.2840.100 for Linux, and 55.0.2883.84 for Android incorrectly applied type rules, which allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4459 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in native/mod_manager/node.c in mod_cluster 1.2.9. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0689 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A denial of service vulnerability in the Android media framework. Product: Android. Versions: 5.0.2, 5.1.1, 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0, 7.1.1, 7.1.2. Android ID: A-36215950. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8802 | 1 Huawei | 6 Secospace Usg6300, Secospace Usg6300 Firmware, Secospace Usg6500 and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The security policy processing module in Huawei Secospace USG6300 with software V500R001C20SPC100, V500R001C20SPC101, V500R001C20SPC200; Secospace USG6500 with software V500R001C20SPC100, V500R001C20SPC101, V500R001C20SPC200; Secospace USG6600 with software V500R001C20SPC100, V500R001C20SPC101, V500R001C20SPC200 allows authenticated attackers to setup a specific security policy into the devices, causing a buffer overflow and crashing the system. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8866 | 2 Imagemagick, Opensuse | 3 Imagemagick, Leap, Opensuse | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| The AcquireMagickMemory function in MagickCore/memory.c in ImageMagick 7.0.3.3 before 7.0.3.8 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted image, which triggers a memory allocation failure. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2016-8862. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8507 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Outlook | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way Microsoft Office software parses specially crafted email messages, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". | ||||
| CVE-2017-0866 | 1 Nvidia | 2 Tegra X1, Tegra X1 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Direct rendering infrastructure of the NVIDIA Tegra X1 where an unchecked input from userspace is passed as a pointer to kfree. This could lead to kernel memory corruption and possible code execution. This issue is rated as moderate. Product: Pixel. Version: N/A. Android ID: A-38415808. References: N-CVE-2017-0866. | ||||
| CVE-2007-5199 | 1 X | 1 Libxfont | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| A single byte overflow in catalogue.c in X.Org libXfont 1.3.1 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7210 | 1 Gnu | 1 Binutils | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| objdump in GNU Binutils 2.28 is vulnerable to multiple heap-based buffer over-reads (of size 1 and size 8) while handling corrupt STABS enum type strings in a crafted object file, leading to program crash. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0015 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge, Windows 10 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8502 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Excel | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Office allows a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way that it handles objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8501. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0032 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0035 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0131, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0131 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way affected Microsoft scripting engines render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers. These vulnerabilities could corrupt memory in such a way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user. If the current user is logged on with administrative user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. This vulnerability is different from those described in CVE-2017-0010, CVE-2017-0015, CVE-2017-0032, CVE-2017-0035, CVE-2017-0067, CVE-2017-0070, CVE-2017-0071, CVE-2017-0094, CVE-2017-0132, CVE-2017-0133, CVE-2017-0134, CVE-2017-0136, CVE-2017-0137, CVE-2017-0138, CVE-2017-0141, CVE-2017-0150, and CVE-2017-0151. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000185 | 1 Swftools | 1 Swftools | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In SWFTools, a memcpy buffer overflow was found in gif2swf. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000210 | 1 Altran | 1 Picotcp | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| picoTCP (versions 1.7.0 - 1.5.0) is vulnerable to stack buffer overflow resulting in code execution or denial of service attack | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000231 | 1 Nlnetlabs | 1 Ldns | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A double-free vulnerability in parse.c in ldns 1.7.0 have unspecified impact and attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0205 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Microsoft Edge improperly accesses objects in memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that enables an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user, aka "Microsoft Edge Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000249 | 1 File Project | 1 File | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue in file() was introduced in commit 9611f31313a93aa036389c5f3b15eea53510d4d1 (Oct 2016) lets an attacker overwrite a fixed 20 bytes stack buffer with a specially crafted .notes section in an ELF binary. This was fixed in commit 35c94dc6acc418f1ad7f6241a6680e5327495793 (Aug 2017). | ||||