Export limit exceeded: 385264 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (385264 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-21441 | 2 Python, Urllib3 | 2 Urllib3, Urllib3 | 2026-09-01 | 7.5 High |
| urllib3 is an HTTP client library for Python. urllib3's streaming API is designed for the efficient handling of large HTTP responses by reading the content in chunks, rather than loading the entire response body into memory at once. urllib3 can perform decoding or decompression based on the HTTP `Content-Encoding` header (e.g., `gzip`, `deflate`, `br`, or `zstd`). When using the streaming API, the library decompresses only the necessary bytes, enabling partial content consumption. Starting in version 1.22 and prior to version 2.6.3, for HTTP redirect responses, the library would read the entire response body to drain the connection and decompress the content unnecessarily. This decompression occurred even before any read methods were called, and configured read limits did not restrict the amount of decompressed data. As a result, there was no safeguard against decompression bombs. A malicious server could exploit this to trigger excessive resource consumption on the client. Applications and libraries are affected when they stream content from untrusted sources by setting `preload_content=False` when they do not disable redirects. Users should upgrade to at least urllib3 v2.6.3, in which the library does not decode content of redirect responses when `preload_content=False`. If upgrading is not immediately possible, disable redirects by setting `redirect=False` for requests to untrusted source. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13735 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-09-01 | 3.7 Low |
| Zephyr's WireGuard implementation in subsys/net/lib/wireguard/wg_crypto.c mishandled keepalive packets. In wg_process_data_message(), any type-4 transport-data message whose payload was exactly 16 bytes (an empty plaintext plus a bare Poly1305 tag, i.e. a keepalive) was accepted and returned immediately, before wg_decrypt_packet() was ever called. The Poly1305 authentication tag was therefore never verified; the only preceding gates were a cleartext receiver-index lookup (get_peer_keypair_for_index() on the attacker-supplied data_hdr->receiver) and a non-cryptographic keypair validity/expiry check. The path is reachable entirely from the network: inbound UDP on the WireGuard port is dispatched by wg_input() to handle_transport_data() and then wg_process_data_message(). The 32-bit receiver index is transmitted in cleartext in WireGuard handshake and data messages, so an on-path observer learns it directly and an off-path attacker can brute-force it against the UDP port. Given an active receiving-valid session for that index, an attacker could send a 16-byte garbage payload and have it accepted without possessing the session key. On acceptance the unauthenticated message caused the management layer to observe a spoofed NET_EVENT_VPN_CONNECTED signal (setting peer->first_valid and notifying any net_mgmt listener) and incremented the keepalive-RX statistic. The impact is limited to integrity of this status signal: no plaintext is decrypted or injected, no key is disclosed, and the early-return path did not update the peer endpoint or liveness timers, so there is no traffic-injection, session-takeover, or availability consequence. The fix removes the pre-decrypt early return so a 16-byte payload flows through wg_decrypt_packet(), which verifies the Poly1305 tag over the empty plaintext, followed by the existing anti-replay check; only an authenticated, non-replayed message is then recognised as a keepalive. Forged keepalives now fail the tag check and are counted as decrypt failures. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13734 | 1 Zephyrproject | 1 Zephyr | 2026-09-01 | 6.5 Medium |
| Zephyr's WireGuard VPN data-plane receive handler wg_process_data_message() in subsys/net/lib/wireguard/wg_crypto.c validated the anti-replay counter too late. After AEAD decryption of a MESSAGE_TRANSPORT_DATA packet succeeded, the code committed several peer-state changes — update_peer_addr() (endpoint roaming update), the keypair->last_rx/peer->last_rx liveness timers, and keypair_update() (promote next→current and destroy the previous keypair) — and only afterward called wg_check_replay(). On a replayed packet the replay check returned -EINVAL, but none of the preceding mutations were rolled back. The AEAD tag authenticates content but not freshness, so a replayed-but-authentic transport packet decrypts correctly. An attacker who captures one valid ciphertext off the wire (an on-path or shared-medium observer) can re-inject it from an arbitrary spoofed source address. Reaching the handler requires no credentials: it is driven directly from inbound UDP datagrams via the dispatch in subsys/net/lib/wireguard/wg.c. Because the state mutations committed before the replay check, the replay repoints the peer endpoint to the attacker-chosen source address (roaming hijack), redirecting the victim's subsequent outbound tunnel traffic until the legitimate peer's next packet re-corrects it; it also prematurely destroys the previous keypair and refreshes the RX liveness timer. The tunnel payload stays encrypted under the session keypair, so this is an integrity/availability impact (traffic redirection and session disruption), not payload disclosure. The fix moves wg_check_replay() to immediately after a successful decrypt, before any peer-state mutation, matching the WireGuard specification and the Linux reference implementation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-13611 | 2026-09-01 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The KiviCare WordPress plugin before 4.5.5 does not perform authorization checks on some of its REST endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to disclose the patient roster and, when a payment gateway is configured, the payment gateway secret key. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12143 | 2 Form-data, Redhat | 2 Form-data, Service Mesh | 2026-09-01 | 7.5 High |
| form-data is a library for creating readable multipart/form-data streams. In versions through 4.0.5, the `field` argument to `FormData#append` and the `filename` option are concatenated verbatim into the `Content-Disposition` header without escaping carriage return (CR), line feed (LF), or double-quote (") characters. An application that passes attacker-controlled data as a field name or filename (for example, an API gateway that turns JSON object keys into multipart field names) allows the attacker to terminate the header line and inject additional headers, or to smuggle entire additional multipart parts, into the request the application forwards to a backend. This can let the attacker add or override form fields (e.g. set `is_admin=true`) seen by the downstream parser. This is an instance of CWE-93 (CRLF injection). The fix escapes CR, LF, and `"` as `%0D`, `%0A`, and `%22` in field names and filenames, matching the serialization browsers use per the WHATWG HTML multipart/form-data encoding algorithm. Exploitation requires the consuming application to use untrusted input as a field name or filename; applications that use only fixed/trusted field names are not affected. Fixed in 2.5.6, 3.0.5, and 4.0.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10420 | 2026-09-01 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| Untrusted pointer dereference vulnerability in Samsung Open Source mTower allows Pointer Manipulation. This issue affects mTower: before 102d3dc75cf8e58e68e4bea54ae3c803992c91be. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0994 | 2 Google, Protobuf | 3 Protobuf, Protobuf-python, Protobuf | 2026-09-01 | 7.5 High |
| A denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability exists in google.protobuf.json_format.ParseDict() in Python, where the max_recursion_depth limit can be bypassed when parsing nested google.protobuf.Any messages. Due to missing recursion depth accounting inside the internal Any-handling logic, an attacker can supply deeply nested Any structures that bypass the intended recursion limit, eventually exhausting Python’s recursion stack and causing a RecursionError. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69223 | 3 Aio-libs, Aio-libs Project, Aiohttp | 4 Aiohttp Session, Aiohttp, Aio-libs and 1 more | 2026-09-01 | 7.5 High |
| AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Versions 3.13.2 and below allow a zip bomb to be used to execute a DoS against the AIOHTTP server. An attacker may be able to send a compressed request that when decompressed by AIOHTTP could exhaust the host's memory. This issue is fixed in version 3.13.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15613 | 1 Kyverno | 1 Kyverno | 2026-09-01 | 6.5 Medium |
| Kyverno before v1.13.4 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) via its Service Call functionality. An attacker with permission to create Kyverno (Cluster)Policies can specify an external URL in a policy's apiCall/service configuration; although Service Call is documented for in-cluster services, it also resolves external addresses, allowing requests to an attacker-controlled server. Because policy context data (including contents of Kubernetes resources such as secrets) is sent in these requests, an attacker can exfiltrate sensitive cluster data. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0682 | 2 Sivel, Theandystratton | 2 Page Restrict, Page Restrict | 2026-09-01 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Page Restrict plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to information disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.5. This is due to the plugin not properly restricting access to posts via the REST API when a page has been made private. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view protected posts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24702 | 1 Sivel | 1 Page Restrict | 2026-09-01 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Matt Martz & Andy Stratton Page Restrict.This issue affects Page Restrict: from n/a through 2.5.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64785 | 1 Apple | 2 Swiftnio Http/2, Swiftnio Http\/2 | 2026-09-01 | 5.3 Medium |
| SwiftNIO HTTP/2 was missing validation on inbound HEADERS frames that let CR, LF, NUL, SP and other control characters reach an HTTP/1.1 backend through NIOHTTP2's HTTP/2-to-HTTP/1 codec, enabling HTTP request smuggling or response splitting. This vulnerability is addressed in swift-nio-http2 version 1.45.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51747 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect access control in the keepAlive function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to emit indirect mesh heartbeat information toward the master via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51745 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect access control in the updatePriStaList function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to refresh the primary station list via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84235 | 1 Rockwell Automation | 1 1756-enbt Module | 2026-09-01 | N/A |
| A denial-of-service security issue exists in the affected product. The security issue stems from a crafted CIP packet being sent crashing the module. The device requires a restart to recover. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51744 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect access control in the recv_mesh_info_sync function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to force mesh configuration synchronization from an attacker-controlled host via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51743 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect access control in the guest_wifi_sync function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to disable guest virtual AP interfaces via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51742 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect access control in the discoverWan function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger WAN discovery logic via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51741 | 2026-09-01 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect access control in the clearDiagnosisLog function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to erase diagnosis logs via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79683 | 2026-09-01 | 8.8 High | ||
| Dell PowerStore contains a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to write attacker-controlled content to arbitrary filesystem paths. | ||||